The self-appointed health guru Vani Hari, better known as The Food Babe, is a master at peddling food-based conspiracy theories and characterizing all chemicals as toxic poisons. Adopting techniques from Alex Jones and Joe Mercola, she trumpets ominous warnings about big food companies out to poison you, but no worries, she will save you from certain sickness. This technique cleverly hijacks the brain and makes her readers so alarmed and anxious that they don’t take the time to fact-check her claims but are suddenly desperate for any relief and wisdom she gladly provides. Just a few of her most prominent unscientific, alarmist and remarkable fails:
Fail 1: Chemicals Are Your Enemy
The Food Babe’s most famous quote is: “There is just no acceptable level of any chemical to ingest, ever.” She spawns unnecessary fear and misinformation regarding chemicals. A brief summary for the average person of what they truly are:
“Chemicals are
elements, or a combination of elements, with a specific composition and
structure. All matter is made of chemicals! We are chemicals. - The air we
breathe is chemicals…… - The food we consume is chemicals that are digested by
chemicals that turn them into more chemicals.
“Describing
toxic and harmful chemicals as just plain ‘chemicals’ comes from a good place.
It is true that not all chemicals are good for us, and even those that are
(like water or fluoride) can be harmful if we are exposed to too much or in the
wrong way. However, all matter is made of chemicals, so it’s important to be
more explicit.
“It’s also
important to mention the popular and misleading idea that natural chemicals are
better for us than synthetic chemicals. First, some of the most toxic chemicals
on Earth are natural. Second, sometimes synthetic is safer for your health,
such as synthetic melatonin supplements since those naturally derived may
contain viral material. Third, some synthetic chemicals are better for the
environment, for example natural sources of vanilla (the vanilla bean) are
being depleted.
“Remember,
most chemicals are pretty amazing, they are all around us and they are us. Take
a minute to look around you. The objects you are able to see are due to
chemicals absorbing light, the things you smell are chemicals binding to your
olfactory receptors, and chemical signals in your body are responsible for your
ability to sense these things. Chemicals deserve respect and appreciation
because whether or not you want to admit it your friends are chemicals!”
Fail 2: Attack Mode - Everyone Who
Disagrees Is A Shill
Instead of
engaging in constructive dialogue with scientists from the food industry who
point out her errors, she aggressively attacks them, calling them shills for
big corporations: At a lecture by the Food Babe, Alison Bernstein (Ph.D. in
Biology and Biomedical Sciences and post-doctoral training in neuro-toxicology
and epigenetics) challenged her:
“When
Bernstein challenged Hari’s claim that organic farming don’t use
pesticides, Hari first falsely contradicted her, then changed the subject and
finally entered attack mode, accusing Bernstein of being one of those ‘people
who don’t want the [pro-organic] message spread.’ Bernstein, she implied,
wasn’t an independent scientist–she is–but a shill for the food industry.
“It was
surprising that Hari even answered questions. At most events–such as an
appearance earlier this year at the University of Florida, Hari refused to
respond to audience queries. Taking questions implies a commitment to
dialogue. Rather, Hari motivates by instilling fear, uncertainty and
doubt. She demonizes what she doesn’t understand, and has become quite wealthy
in the process. Indeed, the hypocrisy of her calling science advocates ‘shills’
is astonishing.
“Bernstein
observed that Hari courts her audience by making it seem as if she is
empowering them: knowledge is power is her narrative. As per her M.O., Food
Babe gushed about empowering consumers with information of the dangerous
ingredients that haunt their foods. But is arming consumers with
misinformation empowering? Or does it exploit their fears of the unknown?
People can only make wise decisions when they have access to accurate
information. Instilling unfounded fears of food is the opposite
of empowering.”
Fail 3: Useless Scare Tactics
The Food Babe doesn’t grasp the concept of “the dose makes
the poison” and boosts her reputation by attacking food companies and their
deadly ingredients. Just one example:
“Azodicarbonamide is used for a couple of purposes. It's used
as part of making plastic foams (thus its reputation as the ‘yoga mat’
chemical), and it's also used as an oxidizer and improver in wheat flour. It's
illegal in some countries, but not in the US and Canada, where it's allowed at
a level up to 45 ppm. It isn't terribly toxic; if you inhale it, there's a very
good chance it will give you asthma, but in the concentrations found in
commercial flour, this isn't really a concern. In addition, it breaks down
during baking into the even less dangerous biurea,
which is present in such small amounts that it's borderline homeopathic. It
probably isn't something we need in our bread flour — if it concerns you, just
buy unbleached flour — but as toxins go, it's only of concern to the people who
manufacture it and the people who use it in plastics factories and grain mills,
presumably people who already use respirators or masks as standard safety
equipment.
"Hari decided that it had to go. After all, if a substance is used in
an industrial process, it has to be bad for you to eat, right? (Please don't
tell her about how soybean oil is used in printing ink and hydraulic fluid,
ethanol is added to gasoline, baking soda is used to strip paint, vinegar can
wash clothes, or the terrifying use of molten table salt in heat-treating
steel.)
“Her
campaign led to Subway, the sandwich chain, pledging in March 2014 not to use it
in their bread dough. Subway had already decided to remove it from their bread
before the Food Babe's petition came along, for reasons unrelated to her
accusations, but her campaign prompted them to announce this fact publicly.
This provided Hari with a stopped clock moment of sorts, but even then for all
the wrong reasons; her campaign was based not on science but chemo-phobic scare
tactics, and targeted the wrong part of the supply chain. While not a complete
waste of time, there was a lot of effort expended for what, in scientific
terms, was a very, very small victory. Presumably she will campaign against
tofu next since it's made out of plaster and chalk .”
Fail 4: A Small Sampling of Six Food
Babe Hypocrisies
What is most
remarkable about The Food Babe is how she condemns certain ingredients in
products put out by commercial food companies, but then promotes alternate
products with the exact same ingredients. And of course she makes a
fortune from these products. Here are just six examples:
----Food
Babe Pushing “Dangerous” Items: Naturally Fresh Deodorant
----Food
Babe Selling “Dangerous” Items: Tarte Blush
----Food
Babe Pushing “Dangerous” Items: Honeysuckle Shampoo
----Food
Babe Pushing “Dangerous” Items: Physician’s Formula Organic Wear
----She Did
It Again! Food Babe Linked To Another Company Using Same Dyes She Forbids
----Trix Are
For Food Babe
Fail 5: Breathtaking List
The Food
Babe has compiled a list of over 610 "dangerous" products, vendors, and brand names. This has to be seen to be believed. Are
shoppers supposed to bring that list to their store and spend hours avoiding
every menacing item? One wonders if even her die-hard followers take everything
she says seriously.
Fail 6: A Letter To The Food Babe From
A Fellow Feminist
From an
indignant Kavin Senapathy, author and public speaker who challenges unscientific
and misleading information. Why exactly is Vani Hari so vindictive, spiteful
and bitter?
“I was
shocked and heartbroken to see you conflating my message and those of my
comrades with the hateful, and violently misogynistic messages you’ve received.
You call me the spokesperson for a ‘hate group,’ yet I’m a feminist, skeptical
and above all else compassionate writer. Many women have been targets of
misogyny online. Internet misogyny is a scourge that we all should continue to
combat together. I too have been targeted, told that I’m ‘poisoning’ my
children and that it will be my fault if they ever suffer a terminal illness.
In addition, I’m Indian-American just like you, and have always defended you
against ignorant racist remarks, in part because I know how it feels.
“While these
attacks are deplorable, they are irrelevant to the majority of sensible,
scientific and civil backlash against your work. Conflating misogyny with
relevant opposition is underhanded. You are using this in an attempt to derail
the entire conversation–a public conversation in which you’ve never even been
willing to engage. You’re throwing yourself a pity party and inviting your
entire army.
“The fact is
you have refused to engage with reasonable critics of your writings–the
misinformation, sometimes dangerous, that you spread so carelessly. Being
critical of your campaigns does not make someone hateful. I’ll repeat, it’s
hurtful and offensive to paint all of your opponents with a ‘hate group’ brush.
Peruse the 4000+ members of the Banned by Food Babe group and read the
comments. These are not the comments of a hate group.
“Vani, you
exemplify the most condemnable misogynistic attacks as representative of your
opponents. None of the people or organizations you lambast in your post condone
these awful attacks. Yet, you personally are responsible for
unsubstantiated, utterly fabricated ad hominem attacks against many of us, and
to which I’ve been subjected all too often–the ‘shill’ gambit.
“Not
everyone who is critical of you is automatically a shill for Big Ag or Big
Biotech. Unfounded accusation of shilling is based in ignorance and
disingenuousness. This is an empty tactic. If any of us truly has a ‘financial
incentive’ to oppose you, please, produce tangible evidence, don’t just spew
rhetoric. How is Dr. Kevin Folta, department chair of Horticultural Sciences at
the University of Florida, one of the most independent of scientists in the
world with no industry connections making money from the biotech industry and
Monsanto? How are Chow Babe, Science Babe, Food Hunk or I profiting from
criticizing your views? Produce evidence.
“Vani, I
implore you to stop name-calling and throwing tantrums, and to respond to the
relevant questions posed to you. And if you disagree, rather than retreat into
your echo chamber of support, venture out and engage with critics. We’re all
willing and eager to dialogue, in public, and in any forum of your choosing.”
Further Reading
Related Posts
128 Nobel Laureates Support GMOs
http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/10/128-nobel-laureates-support-precision.html
Unassailable:
Concisely Eloquent Overview Exposing GMO Hysteria http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/07/unassailable-concisely-eloquent.html
9 MORE
Common Characteristics of People Who Get Duped http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/08/9-more-common-characteristics-of-people.html
10 Common
Characteristics of People Who Get Duped http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/08/10-common-characteristics-of-people-who.html
17 Concise
Reasons Why Natural News Is A Fraud http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/07/17-concise-reasons-why-natural-news-is.html
7 Concise
Reasons Why Alex Jones Is A Fraud http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/05/7-concise-reasons-why-alex-jones-is.html
The Dose
Makes The Poison: 19 Examples Alarmists
Want Hushed http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/03/the-dose-makes-poison-19-examples.html
7 Ways
Health Gurus Dupe The Public http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/03/7-ways-health-gurus-dupe-public.html
13 Concise
Reasons Why Mercola Is A Fraud http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/01/13-concise-reasons-why-mercola-is-fraud_27.html
Photo: https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2015/02/FoodBabe2/lead_large.jpg?1430146643
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave any comments...