Medical crowdfunding is a rapidly growing phenomena that has helped many desperate people raise funds to treat numerous health conditions. While many of the campaigns are for treatments that are valid and evidence-based, there is a growing dark side of fund raising for snake-oil, unproven remedies hawked by self-appointed “doctors”. Many well-intentioned donors fail to properly evaluate whether the treatments being sought are evidence-based.
Research published on April 23, 2019 in PLOS One analyzed a total of 336 medical crowdfunding articles over a two year period in major American and Canadian newspapers. Most of the articles portrayed these campaigns as either positive or neutral. Money needed for cancer treatments was the most common request. A variety of rare diseases was the second most common appeal. Most of the Canadian appeals were for treatments outside of Canada, which are not covered by Medicare.
Several
examples were cited by the researchers of unproven treatments that were not
questioned in any way by the journalist in their article. Three of them are:
--“Preston
has turned to alternative treatments instead of chemotherapy and radiation to
prolong his quality of life, she said. He’s done extensive research and feels
confident in them, she added. He’s currently receiving reiki, a Japanese form
of energy healing.”
--“Her only
chance of survival is treatment in Florida, what doctors call chemo on steroids
that kills the Lyme and rebuilds her system. Jimmelynn’s husband, Rodney, now
administers what treatments he can here at home between visits to Florida
because their insurance doesn’t cover the costs.”
--“Now she
wants to visit a specialist clinic in Germany for treatment as she believes a
cocktail of vitamins will help heal her and improve her quality of life.”
The
researchers summarize their findings:
“More than a
fifth of the relevant articles made a statement suggesting that the treatment
may be inefficacious, experimental or unapproved by regulatory bodies. The
majority of these articles still noted where contributions could be made and
hyperlinked to the online crowdfunding campaigns. Such reporting could be interpreted as promoting and raising money for
unproven or even fraudulent therapies. While it was beyond the scope of the
study to individually assess the scientific and regulatory status of the
interventions sought, we did note that at least some of these articles spoke of
stem cell treatments for which there is little or no supporting evidence (as
noted by both the research community and entities like the International
Society of Stem Cell Research). This is to be expected, as recent research has
shown that there are a significant number of crowdfunding campaigns for
unproven stem cell therapies–some of which parrot the questionable marketing
claims of stem cell clinics.
"There were also examples of articles mentioning
campaigns for unproven therapies without noting their unproven or experimental
nature. Such promotion is a serious
problem, as it likely helps to legitimize unproven therapies, raises funds for
approaches that may harm or defraud patients, and furthers the marketing
campaigns of practitioners offering them. Recent research has found that the marketing language of clinics
offering unproven therapies is often copied or paraphrased directly onto
campaign donation websites, increasing the opportunity for members of the
public to be exposed to false or misleading representations of science. While
we appreciate that the news media is a profit-oriented industry, we hope
popular publications will strive to present health-focused crowdfunding stories
in an evidence-based manner.”
Source
Media
portrayal of illness-related medical crowdfunding: A content analysis of
newspaper articles in the United States and Canada https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215805
Related Posts
21st Century Snake-Oil: Stem Cell Clinics Preying on the Desperate https://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2018/11/21st-century-snake-oil-stem-cell.html
Dying Man’s
Overview of Cancer Quackery http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2016/02/dying-mans-overview-of-cancer-quackery.html
7 Ways
Health Gurus Dupe The Public http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/03/7-ways-health-gurus-dupe-public.html
Good News On
Cancer Survivorship: What The Quacks Don’t Want You To Know http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/02/good-news-on-cancer-survivorship.html
Pseudo-Health
& Snake-Oil: 14 Examples of Faulty Thinking http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2016/06/pseudo-health-snake-oil-14-concise_22.html
Liars! How
Snake-Oil Doctors Use 5 Logical Fallacies http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2015/11/liars-how-snake-oil-doctors-shrewdly.html
9 Basic Ways
We Fool Ourselves Into Believing Things That Aren’t True http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2018/04/9-basic-ways-we-fool-ourselves-into.html
Pseudo-Health: 6 More Ways Liars and Hustlers Use
Confirmation Bias To Dupe The Public http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2018/02/pseudo-health-6-more-ways-liars-and.html
6 Ways Liars
and Hustlers Use Confirmation Bias To Dupe The Public http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2018/02/6-ways-liars-and-hustlers-use.html
30 Prying
and Probing Questions To Bolster Critical Thinking http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2016/10/30-prying-and-probing-questions-to.html
9 MORE
Common Characteristics of People Who Get Duped http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/08/9-more-common-characteristics-of-people.html
10 Common
Characteristics of People Who Get Duped http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/08/10-common-characteristics-of-people-who.html
9 Basic Ways
Shameless Health Gurus Dupe Their Followers http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2018/02/9-basic-ways-shameless-health-gurus.html
Photo: https://www.harpermacleod.co.uk/hm-insights/2016/june/the-scottish-crowdfunding-report-2016-and-the-growth-of-crowdlending/
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave any comments...